|
|
|
|
April 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CME Acneiform facial eruptions A problem for young women Melody J. Cheung, MD Muba Taher, MD, FRCPC Gilles J. Lauzon, MD, PHD, FRCPC
Dr Cheung is a dermatology resident, Dr Taher has completed dermatology residency, and Dr Lauzon is an Associate Professor and Director in the Division of Dermatology, all at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. Acneiform eruptions, such as acne vulgaris, rosacea, folliculitis, and perioral dermatitis, are routinely encountered in primary care. Acne vulgaris alone affects up to 80% of adolescents and continues to affect 40% to 50% of adult women.1 An estimated 13 million Americans are affected by rosacea.2 These conditions often have psychosocial sequelae.3 These four eruptions are challenging to diagnose because they all resemble acne. This article describes these eruptions, highlighting the salient distinguishing characteristics, and summarizes current management recommendations from the medical literature. Quality of evidence PubMed was searched from January 1966 to December 2003 using the names of each of the acneiform conditions combined with “treatment.” Several randomized controlled trials (level I evidence) on treatment of acne vulgaris were found, but there was little level I evidence for treating the other conditions. Recommendations for treating these conditions are based mainly on comparison or open-label studies (level II evidence) and expert opinion and consensus guidelines (level III evidence). Acne vulgaris Acne vulgaris is a disease of the sebaceous follicles that primarily affects adolescents but not uncommonly persists through the third decade and beyond, particularly in women. Pathogenesis is multifactorial and involves an interplay between abnormal follicular keratinization or desquamation, excessive sebum production, proliferation of follicular Propionibacterium acnes, and hormonal factors. Diagnosis is often clear, and laboratory investigations are unnecessary, except where signs and symptoms suggest hyperandrogenism.4,5 Acne is characterized by a variety of lesions that indicate varying degrees of disease severity. Mild or noninflammatory acne is characterized by comedones. Closed comedones appear as pale white, slightly elevated, dome-shaped, 1- to 2-mm papules with no clinically visible follicular orifice (Figure 1). Open comedones are flat or slightly raised lesions with a visible central orifice filled with a brown-black substance (Figure 1). Inflammatory acne has a range of lesions. Papules (Figure 1) are often encircled by an inflammatory halo, and pustules can be identified by a central core of purulent material. Nodules are rounder and deeper to palpation than papules and are often tender. Cysts have a propensity to scar and essentially feel like fluctuant nodules. Acne scars (Figure 1) usually appear as sharply punched out pits.
Before commencing therapy and in the interest of establishing a therapeutic alliance, it is important to explain to patients the causes of acne and the rationale for therapy as well as the expected duration of therapy (weeks to months). The literature suggests that therapy be based on the severity or the predominant morphologic variant of disease. Mild comedonal acne should be treated with topical antimicrobials,1,6-8 such as benzoyl peroxide (available in 2.5/5/10% cream, gel, or wash) or topical comedolytics,1,6-8 such as tretinoin (available in 0.025/0.05/0.1% cream, 0.01/0.025% gel, and 0.05% liquid) (Table 19-24). Benzoyl peroxide is preferred for patients with inflammation8; tretinoin is effective for cases with a predominance of comedones. The recently developed topical retinoid, adapalene, is only marginally more effective than tretinoin, but is better tolerated.7 Choice of treatment depends largely on patients’ tolerance and preference.6 Gels and creams with water bases are less drying than gels in alcohol or glycol bases. Exfoliants, such as salicylic acid, remain an option for acne treatment, but are ineffective for deep comedones and can be irritating.1
Papular and pustular acne can be treated with topical or oral antibiotics (Table 19-24). Both topical erythromycin (available as solution, gel, or pledgets) and clindamycin (available as solution, gel, lotion, or pledgets) are reported to be equally effective.9,25 Topical erythromycin is considered safest during pregnancy.1 Combination topical products, such as Clindoxyl (clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide) and Benzamycin (benzoyl peroxide and erythromycin), have recently come on the market and are quite useful.6 Tetracycline (1000 mg/d in two or four divided doses), because of its effectiveness and low cost, is the first-choice oral antibiotic followed by minocycline (50 to 100 mg/d) or doxycycline (100 mg/d). These drugs are often prescribed, along with topical retinoids, combination products, or antimicrobials, to improve efficacy and prevent resistance from developing. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is best reserved for severe, recalcitrant cases.1 Other oral antibiotics mentioned in the literature include erythromycin, clindamycin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin in no particular order. Most of these drugs should be used for at least 2 months before they are deemed ineffective.6 Cases of treatment-resistant, nodulocystic, or scarring acne should be referred to a dermatologist for isotretinoin treatment, steroid injection, or hormone therapy (Table 19-24). Isotretinoin is notorious for its drying side effects and teratogenicity, but is a very effective medication with a response rate as high as 90%.1 It is administered at 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg daily and titrated to obtain an optimal and early response with minimal side effects. Average duration of therapy is 4 months; a second course might be necessary. Triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injections are feasible for sparser nodulocystic lesions, but care must be taken to avoid steroid atrophy. Finally, for women unresponsive to conventional therapy, hormonal therapy (biphasic or triphasic contraceptive pills or spironolactone, which has strong antiandrogenic activity) is recommended in conjunction with topical treatment.1,8 Rosacea Rosacea is a chronic vascular acneiform facial disorder that affects primarily 20- to 60-year-old people of northern and eastern European descent. Although the condition is equally prevalent in men and women, it is usually more severe in men and can progress to tissue hyperplasia. Pathogenesis remains unknown, although many factors including bacteria, Demodex mites, vasomotor and connective tissue dysfunction, and topical corticosteroids have been implicated. Rosacea is characterized by a triad of symmetrical erythema, papules and pustules, and telangiectasia on the cheeks, forehead, and nose (Figures 2 and 3). The absence of comedones is an important factor that differentiates rosacea from acne vulgaris. Rosacea follows a course of exacerbations and remissions and is often aggravated by sun, wind, and hot drinks. Frequent flushing, mild telangiectasia, increased telangiectasia with acneiform eruptions, and tissue hyperplasia are the four sequential stages of the condition. Rosacea can also be associated with ocular symptoms of burning, redness, itching, sensation of a foreign body, tearing, dryness, photophobia, and eyelid fullness or swelling.26
Begin treatment by discussing potential triggers and how to avoid them. Concomitant topical metronidazole and oral tetracycline are recommended as first-line therapy for early-stage rosacea27,28 (Table 229-33). This combination lowers the potential for relapse once the oral medication is withdrawn.27,28 Oral minocycline (100 to 200 mg/d) is considered an acceptable alternative.28 Doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, ampicillin, and metronidazole have also been shown to be effective (Table 229-33). Oral therapy should be prolonged in those with ocular symptoms, although some sources recommend deferring oral antibiotics until there are ocular complaints.34
There is no significant difference in efficacy between twice-daily treatment with 0.75% topical metronidazole and once-daily treatment with 1.0% metronidazole.27 Topical sulfacetamide is an alternative if metronidazole is not tolerated or if patients want concealment (sulfacetamide is available in a flesh-coloured preparation) (Table 229-33). Oral tetracycline is usually started at 1000 mg/d, tapered, and finally discontinued. Various sources recommend various tapering protocols and duration of therapy. Some recommend tapering to 500 mg/d over 6 weeks followed by a slow maintenance taper to 250 mg/d over 3 months if patients respond; otherwise, a 6-week course of full-dose tetracycline should be repeated.2 Others recommend therapy at full dose until clearance or for 12 weeks’ duration.28 Recently, topical retinoid and vitamin C preparations have been shown to have a beneficial effect29,32 (Table 229-33). For recalcitrant rosacea, a 4- to 5-month course of oral isotretinoin at either low dose (10 mg/d) or the dose used for acne vulgaris has been shown to reduce symptoms.35 Patients with rosacea with fibrotic changes should be referred to a cosmetic surgeon. Folliculitis Folliculitis is an inflammation of the hair follicle as a result of mechanical trauma (eg, shaving, friction), irritation (certain topical agents, such as oils), or infection. Mechanical trauma, occlusion, and immunocompromise predispose patients to infection. The usual infectious organism is Staphylococcus aureus, although Gram-negative folliculitis can result from prolonged use of antibiotics for acne. Pityrosporum, a saprophytic yeast, has also been implicated. Diagnosis is clinical. There is usually an abrupt eruption of small, well circumscribed, globular, dome-shaped, often monomorphic pustules in clusters on hair-bearing areas of the body and face (Figure 4). Deeper follicular infections, or sycosis, although rare, are more erythematous and painful.
Initially, potassium hydroxide testing of the hair and any surrounding scale should be considered to exclude Pityrosporum. Otherwise, an identifying culture should always be taken before initiating therapy.34 In confirmed cases, topical therapy with econazole cream, selenium sulfide shampoo, or 50% propylene glycol36 has been recommended for a duration of 3 to 4 weeks (Table 337-41). Subsequent additional intermittent maintenance doses once to twice a week42 have been found helpful for avoiding recurrence, which is common in folliculitis. Oral antifungals (fluconazole, ketoconazole, or itraconanzole) have been deemed effectivewhen used for 10 to 14 days43 (Table 337-41). One clinical trial demonstrated the superiority of combined topical and oral therapy as compared with either alone.37 Topical therapy for superficial S aureus includes erythromycin, clindamycin, mupirocin, or benzoyl peroxide44 (Table 337-41). Oral antistaphylococcal antibiotics (first-generation cephalosporins, penicillinase-resistant penicillins, macrolides, or fluoroquinolones) are indicated for extensive disease or for the deep involvement of sycosis44 (Table 337-41). Treatment is continued until lesions completely resolve.45 Gram-negative folliculitis can be treated as severe acne with isotretinoin at a dose of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg daily for 4 to 5 months46 (Table 337-41). Alternatives are ampicillin at 250 mg or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at 600 mg four times daily, but response to antibiotic treatment is slow, and relapse is common.
Perioral dermatitis Perioral dermatitis is an acneiform eruption of unknown etiology, although many contributing factors have been implicated: fluorinated topical corticosteroids, subclinical irritant contact dermatitis, and overmoisturization of skin. Women are affected more than men.47 Clinically, the condition appears as an eruption of discrete, symmetrical pinpoint papules and pustules in clusters periorally (on the chin or nasolabial folds, but not on the vermilion border of the lips) that might have an erythematous base (Figure 5). Similar and concomitant lesions are sometimes found at the lateral borders of the eyes.
Despite an unclear etiology, treatment is simple and effective. Perioral dematitis resolves with tetracycline (250 mg two to three times daily for several weeks)48 or erythromycin49 (Table 450,51). Topical antibiotics are less well tolerated and less effective, but remain an option for those who cannot take systemic antibiotics.27 Topical fluorinated corticosteroids should be discontinued. Gradually weaker topical corticosteroids for weaning and prevention of rebound eruptions have been used either as monotherapy or as additional agents to topical metronidazole and oral erythromycin.52
Conclusion Acneiform facial eruptions are common in young women. Differential diagnosis of the four conditions discussed above should be kept in mind when assessing patients. Although there is some overlap in how these conditions present, careful attention to distribution of lesions, morphology, and exacerbating factors can lead to accurate diagnosis and optimal therapy.
Acknowledgment We thank Dr Thomas G. Salopek and Dr Benjamin Barankin for supplying some figures for this article. Competing interests None declared Correspondence to: Dr M.J. Cheung, Dermatology Resident, Division of Dermatology, 2-104 Clinical Sciences Bldg, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3; telephone (780) 407-1555; fax (780) 407-3003; e-mail melody@ualberta.ca References 1. Nguyen QH, Kim YA, Schwartz RA. Management of acne vulgaris. Am Fam Physician 1994;50(1):89-96. 2. Cuevas T. Identifying and treating rosacea. Nurse Pract 2001;26(6):13-5,19-23. 3. Gupta MA. Psychosocial aspects of common skin diseases. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:660-5 (Eng), 668-70 (Fr). 4. Jabbour SA. Cutaneous manifestations of endocrine disorders: a guide for dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4(5):315-31. 5. Tourniaire J, Pugeat M. Strategic approach of hyperandrogenism in women. Horm Res 1983;18(1-3):125-34. 6. Taylor MB. Treatment of acne vulgaris: guidelines for primary care physicians. Postgrad Med 1991;89(8):40-7. 7. Cunliffe WJ. Management of adult acne and acne variants. J Cutan Med Surg 1998;2(Suppl 3):7-13. 8. Burdon-Jones D. New approaches to acne. Aust Fam Physician 1992;21(11):1615-22. 9. Shalita AR, Smith EB, Bauer E. Topical erythromycin versus clindamycin therapy for acne. A multicenter, double-blind comparison. Arch Dermatol 1984;120:351-5. 10. Hughes BR, Norris JF, Cunliffe WJ. A double-blind evaluation of topical isotretinoin 0.05%, benzoyl peroxide gel 5% and placebo in patients with acne. Clin Exp Dermatol 1992;17(3):165-8. 11. Nyirady J, Grossman RM, Nighland M, Berger RS, Jorizzo JL, Kim YH, et al. A comparative trial of two retinoids commonly used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J DermatolTreat 2001;12(3):149-57. 12. Pochi PE, Bagatell FK, Ellis CN, Stoughton RB, Whitmore CG, Saatjian GD, et al. Erythromycin 2 percent gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 1988;41(2):132-6. 13. Kuhlman DS, Callen JP. A comparison of clindamycin phosphate 1 percent topical lotion and placebo in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 1986;38(3):203-6. 14. Lookingbill DP, Chalker DK, Lindholm JS, Katz HI, Kempers SE, Huerter CJ, et al. Treatment of acne with a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel compared with clindamycin gel, benzoyl peroxide gel and vehicle gel: combined results of two double-blind investigations. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37(4):590-5. 15. Chalker DK, Shalita A, Smith JG Jr, Swann RW. A double-blind study of the effectiveness of a 3% erythromycin and 5% benzoyl peroxide combination in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983;9(6):933-6. 16. Gammon WR, Meyer C, Lantis S, Shenefelt P, Reizner G, Cripps DJ. Comparative efficacy of oral erythromycin versus oral tetracycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. A double-blind study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;14(2 Pt 1):183-6. 17. Cullen SI, Cohan RH. Minocycline therapy in acne vulgaris. Cutis 1976;17(6):1208-10,1214. 18. Parsad D, Pandhi R, Nagpal R, Negi KS. Azithromycin monthly pulse vs daily doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Dermatol 2001;28(1):1-4. 19. Panzer JD, Poche W, Meek TJ, Derbes VJ, Atkinson W. Acne treatment: a comparative efficacy trial of clindamycin and tetracycline. Cutis 1977;19(1):109-11. 20. Cunliffe WJ, Meynadier J, Alirezai M, George SA, Coutts I, Roseeuw DI, et al. Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.1%, versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49(3 Suppl):S218-26. 21. Levine RM, Rasmussen JE. Intralesional corticosteroids in the treatment of nodulocystic acne. Arch Dermatol 1983;119:480-1. 22. Peck GL, Olsen TG, Butkus D, Pandya M, Arnaud-Battandier J, Gross EG, et al. Isotretinoin versus placebo in the treatment of cystic acne. A randomized double-blind study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982;6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):735-45. 23. Rosen MP, Breitkopf DM, Nagamani M. A randomized controlled trial of second- versus third-generation oral contraceptives in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188(5):1158-60. 24. Hatwal A, Bhatt RP, Agrawal JK, Singh G, Bajpai HS. Spironolactone and cimetidine in treatment of acne. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1988;8(1):84-7. 25. Schachner L, Pestana A, Kittles C. A clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of a topical erythromycin-zinc formulation with a topical clindamycin formulation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;22(3):489-95. 26. Zug KA, Palay DA, Rock B. Dermatologic diagnosis and treatment of itchy red eyelids. Surv Ophthalmol 1996;40(4):293-306. 27. Zuber TJ. Rosacea. Dermatology 2000;27(2):309-18. 28. Cohen AF, Tiemstra JD. Diagnosis and treatment of rosacea. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15(3):214-7. 29. Carlin RB, Carlin CS. Topical vitamin C preparation reduces erythema of rosacea. Cosmetic Dermatol 2001;2:35-8. 30. Dahl MV, Katz HI, Krueger GG, Millikan LE, Odom RB, Parker F, et al. Topical metronidazole maintains remissions of rosacea. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:679-83. 31. Wilkin JK, DeWitt S. Treatment of rosacea: topical clindamycin versus oral tetracycline. Int J Dermatol 1993;32(1):65-7. 32. Vienne MP, Ochando N, Borrel MT, Gall Y, Lauze C, Dupuy P. Retinaldehyde alleviates rosacea. Dermatology 1999;199(Suppl 1):53-6. 33. Hoting E, Paul E, Plewig G. Treatment of rosacea with isotretinoin. Int J Dermatol 1986;25(10):660-3. 34. Mengesha YM, Bennett ML. Pustular skin disorders: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol 2002;3(6):389-400. 35. Erdogan FG, Yurtsever P, Aksoy D, Eskioglu F. Efficacy of low-dose isotretinoin in patients with treatment-resistant rosacea. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:884-5. 36. Back O, Faergemann J, Hornqvist R. Pityrosporum folliculitis: a common disease of the young and middle-aged. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;12(1 Pt 1):56-61. 37. Abdel-Razek M, Fadaly G, Abdel-Raheim M, al-Morsy F. Pityrosporum (Malassezia) folliculitis in Saudi Arabia—diagnosis and therapeutic trials. Clin Exp Dermatol 1995;20(5):406-9. 38. Parsad D, Saini R, Negi KS. Short-term treatment of pityrosporum folliculitis: a double blind placebo-controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998;11(2):188-90. 39. Bork K, Brauers J, Kresken M. Efficacy and safety of 2% mupirocin ointment in the treatment of primary and secondary skin infections—an open multicentre trial. Br J Clin Pract 1989;43(8):284-8. 40. Tassler H. Comparative efficacy and safety of oral fleroxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium in skin and soft tissue infections. Am J Med 1993;94(3A):159-165S. 41. Plewig G, Nikolowski J, Wolff HH. Action of isotretinoin in acne rosacea and Gram-negative folliculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982;6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):766-85. 42. Faergemann J. Pityrosporum infections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31(3 Pt 2):S18-20. 43. Aly R, Berger T. Common superficial fungal infections in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22(Suppl 2):S128-32. 44. Stulberg DL, Penrod MA, Blatny RA. Common bacterial skin infections. Am Fam Physician 2002;66(1):119-24. 45. Berger TG. Treatment of bacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections in the HIV-infected host. Semin Dermatol 1993;12(4):296-300. 46. Boni R, Nehroff B. Treatment of Gram-negative folliculitis in patients with acne. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4(4):273-6. 47. Hogan DJ. Perioral dermatitis. Curr Prob Dermatol 1995;22:98-104. 48. Wilkinson DS, Kirton V, Wilkinson JD. Perioral dermatitis. A 12-year review. Br J Dermatol 1979;101(3):245-57. 49. Coskey RJ. Perioral dermatitis. Cutis 1984;34(1):55-6,58. 50. Miller WS. Tetracycline in the treatment of perioral dermatitis. N C Med J 1971;32(11):471-2. 51. Veien NK, Munkvad JM, Nielsen AO, Niordson AM, Stahl D, Thormann J. Topical metronidazole in the treatment of perioral dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24(2 Pt 1):258-60. 52. Bikowski JB. Topical therapy for perioral dermatitis. Cutis 1983;31(6):678-82. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
|
www.cfpc.ca
Peer reviewed
|
MEDLINE |
| |
|
| © 1996-2006 | The College of Family Physicians of Canada Subscription rates |