Skip to Main Content

Preparing our Future Family Physicians Report & Evidence Summaries

Debunking OTP Myths: Spotlighting real solutions

To enhance your understanding of the OTP, we have gathered and addressed the most prevalent misconceptions making sure you have a clear perspective of how transformative the project will be for our profession.

 
     

    Myth 1: A three-year residency will undermine the profession and drive people away from becoming family doctors.

  • Fact: A three-year renewed residency will not create a gap year without graduates. Full stop.

    • The three-year renewed residency will be phased in gradually starting in 2027.
    • In a renewed three-year residency, our aim is to have residents in their transitional phase of training provide service in needed areas with a commitment to underserved communities and unattached patients.
    • The three-year renewed residency will better prepare graduates to practice anywhere, ideally in a team setting, and adjust to the changing role of family physicians. This will increase:
      • Health workforce capacity
      • Efficiency and care coordination that may reduce referrals
      • High-quality primary care and help managing complex, chronic illness
  • Fact: A three-year renewed residency will strengthen training.

    Family physicians are certified by the CFPC to practice. We know that there are competencies that many programs are not able to tackle or strengthen because of time constraints. With a three-year residency, curriculum enhancement will include the following topics, which are aligned with societal needs:
    • Home and long-term care
    • Addiction and mental health care
    • Emergency/acute care medicine
    • Indigenous health
    • Health equity and anti-racism
    • Virtual care and health informatics (digital health)
  • Fact: Being a family doctor is hard but one of the most rewarding medical careers.

    The role of family physicians is evolving as we provide more complex care. We hope to attract medical students who are interested in full-scope practice. We do not want to maintain a two-year residency simply to be the shortest available option. Family medicine is not for everyone, but it is a rewarding career for someone who:
    • Values relationships and whole person care
    • Offers versatility and adaptiveness
    • Enjoys diagnostic puzzles and possesses impeccable clinical acumen
    • Values community life, seeks to overcome inequities, and improve health conditions
    • Thrives as a collaborative leader in a health care team

  •  

    Myth 2: There was no reason to implement a three-year renewed residency now. We should have waited.

  • Fact: There is a crisis in family medicine. The status quo is no longer an option.

    The CFPC’s Prescription for Primary Care identifies solutions to meet the needs of Canada’s health care systems and help solve the crisis in family medicine. One of the key solutions includes education reform. This is the current work of the OTP, which is funded by the Team Primary Care: Training for Transformation initiative (TPC). OTP is one of TPC’s 20 practitioner-specific training projects, which aims to change the practice environment and strengthen residency training, helping to achieve the Patient’s Medical Home vision.

  • Fact: Transformative change takes time. We cannot wait.

    The recommended changes to residency training are complex and will take multiple years to implement. See our project roadmap. Waiting would only prolong the current crisis in family medicine. The urgency to get started dovetails with the urgency of health system change and addressing physician well-being.

  • Fact: The needs of patients are changing and becoming more complex.

    Millions of people in Canada do not have a family doctor and managing the needs of communities is becoming increasingly complex. To better serve our communities and prioritize physicians’ well-being, we need comprehensive team-based care. With a three-year residency, future physicians will be able to work in a team-based model and offer care that meets the needs of today’s patients.


  •  

    Myth 3: The CFPC is not basing these decisions on robust evidence and they did not consult broadly.

  • Fact: The CFPC spent four years researching and consulting with a range of interest holders.

    The CFPC has:
    • Consulted with more than 500 interest holders across more than 175 activities. This includes:
      • Field research with more than 300 practicing family physicians, including rural physicians. Analysis also included residents and medical students.
      • Multiple expert panels with members who are teachers and educational leaders.
      • Discussions with Chapters, the academic community, regulators and decision makers across Canada.
    • Consulted with the Board regarding the proposed changes on a regular basis.
    • Conducted multiple literature searches (resulting in more than 25,000 reviewed articles) and assessed 25 different data sets (national, provincial, electronic medical records).
    Our research findings can be found in these in our related resources and evidence summaries.

Download the OTP Report
Summary Data
Summary 2 Defining Preparedness
Summary 3 Prepared Practice
Summary 4 Inquiry Comparing
Summary 5 Number of FP
Summary 6 Understanding Distribution
Summary 7 Scope of Practice
Summary 8 Practice Choices
Summary 9 International Review
Summary 10 COVID-19
Summary 11 Optimal

No results found.

No results found.

No results found.